Yazeed Kon Tha?

Some quotes from great scholars on Yazeed I found out. Unfortunately our Muslims don't even know that the scholars and Ulemas who quoted several thousand ahadith and riwayaat also quoted the history as they found the information in their era. Today some people calls "Radi Allah o Unho" with Yazeed, just because they know a SINGLE hadith referring to the Jihad of constantinople.... First read the quotes from several historians/ulemas/scholars about yazeed, given as under:

Hazrat Abu Bureza Aslami Radi Allah Anhu Farmtay Hain Kay Jab Imam Hussain Radi Allah Ka Sare Mubarak Yazee Dkay Samnnay Rakha Gaya To Yazeed Apni Chahri Imam Hussain Kay Laboon Par Marnay Laga.

(Tareekh e Tabri, Jild 5 Page 465)

Imam Ibne Hajar Askalani Alheay Rehma Likhtay Hain Kay Kisi Nay Hazrat Umer Bin Abdul Aziz Radi Allah Anhu Kay Darbar Main Yazeed Ko Ameer Ul Momeneen Kaha Apnay Us Ko 20 Koroon Ki Saza Di (Tahzeeb Ul Tehzeem Jild 11 Page 361)

Allam Zehbi Alehay Rehma Farmatay Hain Kay Yazeed Ek Mayoob Insaan Tha Woh Is Kabil Nahi Tha Kay Ussay Riwayaat Li Jati.

(Mezanul Ietadal Jild 4 Page 440)

Imam Gazali Farmatay Hain Kay Imam Hussain kay Qatil Aur Apkay Qatal Ka Hukum Dainay Walay Par Allah Ki Lanat Ho.

(Aehaya Ul Uloom Jild 3 Page 122)

"Muhadis Royani Nay Apni Masnad Main Hazrat Abu Dwaood Radi Allah Anhu Say Riyaat Ki Hey Kay Rasool Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam Nay Farmaya Meray Tarekay Ko Badalnay Wala Saab Say Pehla Shaks Banii Umaya Say Hey Aur Name Us Ka Yazeed Hoga"

(Tareek Al Khulfa Page 142) (Sawah Muharaka Ibne Hajar Makki Page 219)

Yazeed Say Mutalik Hadith Main Muzammat Hadith: "Hazrat Ubeed Bin Jarah Famatay Hain Rasool Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam Nay Irshad Farmaya May Meri Ummat Ka Mamla Adal Wa Insaaf Par Qaim Raheyga Yahan Tak Kay Rukhna Andazi Karnay Wala Pehal Shaks Bani Umaya Say Hoga Aur Name Uska Yazeed Hoga"

(Majmooa Al Zawaid Jild 5 Page 241) (Lissan Almeezan Jild 6 Page 294) (Tareekh Al Khulfa Page 142)

Ibn Kathir wrote : "Traditions inform us that Yazid loved worldly vices, would drink, listen to music, kept the company of boys with no facial hair (young boys). (civilized expression for pedophilia). Yazid played drums. He enjoyed making dogs, frogs, bears and monkeys fight.  Every morning he used get intoxicated and used to bind monkey with the saddle of a horse and make the horse run." (Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Dhikr Yazeed bin Muawiya , Vol 8 Page 1169).

(1) Imam Ibn Hajr al-Asqalani wrote:     

وأما المحبة فيه والرفع من شأنه فلا تقع إلا من مبتدع فاسد الاعتقاد فإنه كان فيه من الصفات ما يقتضي سلب الإيمان عمن يحبه لأن الحب في الله والبغض في الله من الإيمان والله المستعان

Loving and glorifying Yazid is not done except by a Heretic (apostate)  who has void belief because Yazid had such characteristics that his lover deserves to be faithless.  To love and hate just for the sake of Allah is a sign of faith. [ Al-Imta bil al-Arba'in al-Matbainatus Sama'a (الإمتاع بالأربعين المتباينة السماع), Imam Ibn Hajr al Asqalani, Dar ul Kutb al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, Lebanon, 1997, Page 96]

Ibn Hajr also wrote :  "All Ahle Sunnah agree that Yazid was a fasiq (transgressor), fajir (debaucher) and a drunkard.  Al-Waqidi (748-822) recorded a narration : the people who had seen Yazid said 'Verily we opposed Yazid fearing Allah would rain stones down on us because Yazid considered  Nikah with mothers and sisters permissible and drank alcohol.  Ad-Dhahabi narrates that when Abdullah bin Kuzai returned from Damascus, he stated that Yazid performs Zina with his close female kins. We better start a movement to oppose Yazid otherwise stones may rain down on us. This is the reason Ibn Hajr Makki calls Yazid one of the most debased men in History."

 Ad-Dhahabi wrote about Yazid as follows:

وكان ناصبيا فظا غليظا جلفا يتناول المسكر ويفعل المنكر افتتح دولته بمقتل الشهيد الحسين واختتمها بواقعة الحرة فمقته الناس ولم يبارك في عمره وخرج عليه غير واحد بعد الحسين كأهل المدينة قاموا لله

Yazid was a disgusting Nasibi (those who hate Ahle bait). He drank wine and did evil. He started his kingdom with the killing of the Imam Hussain (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) and ended it with the incident of al-Harra (siege of Madina which also makes him directly liable for La'nah as Sahih Ahadith prove). Hence the people hated him, he was not blessed in his life and many took up arms against him after Imam Hussain(رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) such as the people of Madina - they rose for the sake of Allah (سبحانہ و تعا لی)  ( Siyar al Alam an Nabula, Volume No. 4, Page No. 37-38 )

Jalaluddin Suyuti mentioned in his book ‘The History of the Rightly Guided Caliphs’ (Tareekh al-Khulufa ar-Rashideen); “Nawfal bin Abi al-Faraat said  ‘Once I was with Umar bin Abdul Aziz when a man said in his presence  ‘Yazid, the leader of the believers’. Umar bin Abdul Aziz said [in shock] ‘Did you call Yazid the Leader of the Believers'? Umar then ordered for the man to be lashed 20 times”.

Suyuti further writes that Yazid was involved in sacking Madina and killing a generation of the Companions, and in desecrating and robbing Madinah. After creating carnage in Madina in the incident of Harrah, the army of Yazid proceeded to Makkah to confront Hadhrat Abdullah Ibn Zubair (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ).  In Makka, the Army of Yazid committed unthinkable war crimes. Even Ka'abatullah was heavily damaged in Yazid's military operation.  

It is in Hadith - Prophet (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم)  said, whoever terrifies the people of Madinah, upon him is the curse of Allah (سبحانہ و تعا لی), that of His angels and that of all the people of the world. (Sahih Muslim).

Ibn Kathir wrote in his Tarikh under events of 63 AH (682 AD) as follows:

 

Abdullah Ibn Zubair (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) said: فقال ابن الزبير يا هؤلاء قتل أصحابكم فانا لله وإنا إليه راجعون  (O'People, your companions have been killed. Inna lillahi wa inna elaihi raji'oon).  

وقد أخطأ يزيد خطأ فاحشا فى قوله لمسلم بن عقبة أن يبيح المدينة ثلاثة أيام وهذا خطأ كبير فاحش مع ما انضم إلى ذلك من قتل خلق من الصحابة وأبنائهم وقد تقدم أنه قتل الحسين وأصحابه على يدى عبيد الله بن زياد وقد وقع فى هذه الثلاثة أيام من المفاسد العظيمة فى المدينة النبوية مالا يحد ولا يوصف مما لا يعلمه إلا الله عز وجل وقد أراد بارسال مسلم بن عقبة توطيد سلطانه وملكه ودوام أيامه من غير منازع فعاقبه الله بنقيض قصده وحال بينه وبين ما يشتهيه فقصمه الله قاصم الجبابرة وأخذه أخذ عزيز مقتدر وكذلك أخذ ربك إذا أخذ القرى وهى ظالمة إن أخذه أليم شديد

Yazid committed a mistake and that too a disgusting one by ordering Muslim bin Uqba to make Madina "mubah" (Free for all) for three days.  This was his biggest and ugliest blunder. Many Sahaba and their children were slaughtered.  As it has been mentioned earlier that Yazid made Ubaidullah Ibn Ziyad kill the grandson of Rasulullah (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم), Imam Hussain (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) and his companions (in Karbala). In a swift three days rampage in Madina, heinous crimes were committed about which nobody knows except Allah. Yazid wanted to secure his Governance by sending Muslim bin Uqbah, but Allah did against his wishes and punished him. Verily Allah killed him likewise. Allah made grip over the oppressing towns, no doubt His grip is painful and strict". (Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Vol 8 Page 283) 

_________________________________________________________________________________

Now lets see that what was the hadith of constantinople and what is the truth we comes to know from History.

Hadith of the Prophet -- Allah bless and greet him and his Family:

"Lataftahanna al-Qustantiniyya wa lani`ma al-amiru amiruha wa lani`ma

al-jayshu dhalika al-jaysh."

"Verily you shall conquer Constantinople. What a wonderful leader will her

leader be, and what a wonderful army will that army be!"

Narrated from Bishr al-Khath`ami or al-Ghanawi by:

Ahmad, al-Musnad 14:331 #18859 [sahih chain according to Hamza al-Zayn]

al-Hakim, al-Mustadrak 4:421-422 [sahih according to him and al-Dhahabi

concurred]

al-Tabarani, al-Mu`jam al-Kabir 2:38 #1216 [sahih chain according to

al-Haythami 6:218-219]

al-Bukhari, al-Tarikh al-Kabir 2:81 and al-Saghir 1:306

Ibn `Abd al-Barr, al-Isti`ab 8:170 [hasan chain according to him]

al-Suyuti, al-Jami` al-Saghir [sahih according to him]

Muhammad Al-Fateh was the Conqueror of Constantinople. Constantinople is a city connecting the Mediterranean with the Black Sea, and Asia with Europe. It was considered the best global trade center in the medieval ages. About it, Napoleon said: “If the world was one kingdom, there would be no better city befitting to be its capital than Constantinople.” Because of its strategic location and the hadith of Rasul Allah (sal Allahu alaihi wa sallam), Muslims tried to conquer the city for over 800 years, through 10 attempts. The first was by Othman Bin Affan (radi Allahu anhu), the second and third by Moawiya Bin Abi Sufiyan, the fourth by Sulaiman Bin Abdul-Malik and the fifth by Harun Al-Rashid. There were several other attempts, until Muhammad Al-Fateh conquered it. To conquer it he accomplished the incredible feat of dragging 70 naval ships for 5 km over land on greased tree trunks in one night, landing in the sea right in front of the city walls by dawn. 

May ALLAH Almighty helps us to find the truth and to research that what our history is and what we are told today by some so called scholars....

Aur Jab Hum Ne Farishtoun Ko Hukum Dia Ke Aadam

Ko Sajda Karo Toh Sab Ne Sajda Kia Magar Iblees Ne

Na Kia. Wo Jinnat Main Se Tha Toh Apne Parwardigar

Ke Hukum Se Bahar Ho Gaya. Kia Tum Us Ko Aur Us Ki

Aulad Ko Mere Siwa Dost Banate Ho. Halanke Wo

Tumhare Dushaman Hain Aur Shaitaan Ki Dosti Zalimoun Ke Liye Khuda Ki Dosti Ka Bura Badal Hai.

[ Surah e Al Kahf : Ayaat No. 50 ]

TuQ Long March, a success or?

TuQ came from canada with a slogan "SYASAT NAHI, RIYAASAT BACHAO"... From the first day he challenged the system that reforms should be made and induced in the coming elections. He never deviated from a point that election commission should take such steps that culprits, non tax payers and fraud people cannot be elected further. As we have seen that Governemt and Opposition were even united for a mix-type care taker government and they nominated Mahmood Khan Achak Zai... The decision was challenged by PTI and TuQ and named it "MUK MUKA"....

Although the constitution comprises of a comprehensive structure of clauses but we can see that pre-polling and election buying is always proved to be a trend for both big parties of Pakistan i.e. PML(N) and PPP. PTI was the first who rises the flag of change and comes with the great spirit and enthusiasm, people started following him. specially the educated class acknowledged Imran Khan and his cause. But then we saw that old dedicated workers were thrown aside and new faces are inducted in PTI which were already tested dozens of times. This was not at all a good decision. Secondly no consistency were seen in the PTI sit-ins in karachi and Long March in wazeeristan. A pact could be signed at both times between government and PTI to stop brutal killings by drones in FATA, but the long march proved to be a political show-off.

December 23rd TuQ came to Pakistan and the party which came to front to support him was MQM. No doubt MQM has struggled a lot to come above and since years this party got many changes in it, but they were a big alliance of PPP and definitely the long march was against the government in which MQM was also a shareholder. The step to support TuQ was no doubt a good step but as soon as they backed out their hypocrisy was highlighted. It was a big political loss for MQM to step back from long march but every other political party ( whether in government or opposition acknowledged it ) ... and finally they ended with the moral support only.

TuQ stands out for a long march against the government to bring the electoral reforms so that culprits SELECTION can be stopped in next election. Government couldn't accept this as they know that by accepting this demand they will be the sufferer.. A great alliance was seen under these circumstances that opposition was united at one place and PPP and coalition parties united at other side. Only PTI was the party standing in between. In such circumstances they should join either Government side or opposition side which they definitely could not... They lost the other chance to join TuQ, although he continuously insisted on PTI participation. While in Sit-in there was a exemplary peace could be seen, no riots, no chaos and even no bad management could be noticed.

Finally after 4 days sit-in, TuQ was successful enough that Government has signed a pact with him in which 2 out of 4 clauses were accepted as it is including the electoral reform clause which was a big success of TuQ. other two points were discussed in details which includes the dissolution of assembly which government didn't accept but they comes to a pint with consensus that It will definitely be dissolved before the exact date of dissolution. Other point was the reshaping election commission which was also demanded by PTI, but TuQ was successful here too that a core committee of big constitutional champs (lawyers like Khalid Ranjha, Aitizaz Ahsan, Waseem sajjad etc)  will analyze that what can be done.

Concluding the whole scenario it can be said that if Long March was not a success then it couldn't be declared as a failure too. Revolution started with peaceful sit-in of tens of thousands of people and it was ended peacefully which was a great success. All political parties accepted long march a historical march and biggest sit-in of Pakistan. which they were refusing till one day before that it is a few thousand sit-in.. But it is very much clear that all political parties are united and all so called visionary leaders have the only vision to get into Government. May ALLAH bless our country and our nation.

Roshan Khayali

. آج میں جس موضوع پر لیب کشی کر رہا ہوں وہ ہے "پاکستان کا مستقبل اور   روشن خیال نوجوان " . روشن  خیالی کے مفہوم کو دیکھتے ہے یہ کہا جا سکتا ہے کے دنیا میں سب سے پہلے روشن خیالی کے علمبردار پیغمبر ا اسلام  ہیں. تاریخ ک اوراق کو پلٹا  جائے تو صاف نظر آے گا کے مشرکین ور کفّار بھی تن گ نظر تھے . ان کہ  یہاں انسانی اقدار کی کوئی حیثیت نہیں تھی. خاص کر جوانوں کو غلام بنا کر ذلّت کی زندگی گزرنے پر مجبور کیا جاتا تھا. ان پر طرح طرح کہ  ظلم ڈھاے جاتے تھے .لکن دین  اسلام نے دنیا کی کایا پلٹ دی . حضرت علی  ، خالد بن ولید، طارق بن زیاد ، محمد بن قاسم اور  محمد علی جناح جیسے جوانوں کی مثال ہمارے سامنے ہے .اسی لئے یہ بات کہی جا سکتی ہے ک کسی بھی ملک کو بنانے میں یا بگڑنے میں سب سے زیادہ کردار نوجوانوں کا ہوتا ہے. اگر کسی ملک کے نوجوان با صلاحیت ، تعلیم یافتہ، اور  اصول پسند ہیں تو وہ  اس ملک کی تقدیر بدل سکتے ہیں. 

 لیکن آج  میں جب اپنے ملک کا جوانوں کو دیکھتا ہوں تو یہی سوچتا ہوں کہ 

آنکھ  جو کچھ دیکھتی ہے  لب پہ  آسکتا نہیں 

محو حیرت ہوں ک دنیا کیا سے کیا ہوجاےگی 

آج کل ک جوانوں کا حال تو ملاحظہ کیجیے ذرا: 

ایک کان میں بالی ہے،       دوسرا کان خالی ہے 

شرٹ پے ان کی جالی  ہے، زبان پر ان کے گا لی ہے 

سوال یہ پیدا ہوتا ہے ، کے کیا یہی روشن خیالی ہے ؟

بقول اکبر الہ آبادی ..:

حکّام پی بیم ک گولے ہیں ور مولویوں پی گلی ہے 

کالج نے یہ کیسے سانچوں میں لڑکوں کی طبیت دہلی ہے ؟

لڑکیوں کا حال بھی کچھ مختلف نہیں...

جینس کی پینٹ ہے، باب کاٹ بال ہیں ور آنکھوں میں؟ آنکھوں میں شرم و حیا  کے بجاے  نیلے پیلے لینس ہیں

 ..اکبر الہ آبادی کہتے ہیں:

حامیدہ چمکی نہ تھی جب انگلش سے بیگانہ تھی 

آج ہے چراغ ا انجمن ، پہلے چراغ خانہ تھی 

سو میں یہ کہنے میں حق بجانب ہوں ک آج کل کے نوجوانوں نے روشن خیالی کا غلط مطلب اخذ کر لیا ہے . اسکا مطلب بے حیائی  اور غلط روش اختیار کرنا نہیں بلکے ایمان ، اتحاد اور تنظیم جیسے اصولوں پر کاربند رہتے ہے زمانے کے ساتھ چلنا ہے . اگر ہمارے جوانوں نے اب بھی آنکھیں نہ کھولیں تو یقینن ہماری داستان بھی نہ ہوگی داستانوں میں...

خدا نے آج تک اس قوم کی حالت نہیں بدلی،

نہ ہو جسکو خیال ، آپ اپنی حالت بدلنے کا 

Mahajir

Jin logon ne mulk banaya, wo aaj bhi mahajir hyn
Qoum ho k bhi pehchany nae, or aaj bhi mahajir hyn

Marty bhi hum hyn or ilzam e qatl bhi hum per?
Khud ko maarny waley, kese aaj bhi mahajir hyn?

tum jazbat se khelo hamarey, karoron ki tauheen karo
tauheen karney waly magar, aaj bhi mahajir hyn

Laakh ilzam lagao, hum janty hyn manzil apni

Jaan hatheli pe rakhny waly, aaj bhi mahajir hyn

20 lakh jaaneyn ganwa kar, ye NISHAAN mila

seene pe sajany waly, aaj bhi mahajir hyn

Iqbal or Jinah dekho ye sab or gawahi tou do

arze watan pe mitny waly, aaj bhi mahajir hyn

Aman Ki Asha

In 65 years, the war has only ruined the states... The nation was solely indulged into the hatred.. In general if a survey will be conducted then people will not want the wars... Ask the people whose relatives have lost their lives during the war of 1965, 1971. People only claims them SHAHEED, their families are so proud that their people are SHAHEED in the name of the country. Our nation don't even remember their names. People only recall their bravery on the occasions of 6th september or 14th August.

 

Our Army doesn't need any war with India.. How could ? They are already in war with Pakistan.. Clear examples can be seen in KPK and Balouchistan. Army operation was conducted against the People called MAHAJIRS in 1992 for more than 8 years, and they are brutally being killed till now. Who is responsible for this? 20 lakh people lost their lives during partition in 1997 and 20,000 people who migrated from India have lost their lives during 8 years of operation. We only remembers the figures but nobody asks them that for what reason they are called as SHAHEED as both of them were killed for no reason.

AMAN ki ASHA needs to be promoted inside Pakistan to make people aware that wars are not the solution. We are a sole entity and we know our good and bad. But friendship doesn't mean that we don't recognizes our enemies. Neither any Pakistani has accepted Jammu Kashmir as a part of India nor we accepted that India has stopped intervening in our country.. But promoting hatred is not the solution.. We should remember the SULAH E HUDAIBIYA.

jab yaad aty hyn

Khoon rulata hey waqiya e karbal aksar
nezon pe katay hue sir, jab yaad aty hyn

kahin zainab ki wo aahen, kahin sakina ki sadayen
mayusiyoun k wo pal, jab yaad atay hyn

na jhukaya tha kabhi ye sir na jhukey ga kabhi
quran parhty huey wo lab, jab yaad aty hyn

banglay or kothiyan dekh k bahr ati hyn aankhen

shazadiyoun k khemey, jab yaad aty hyn

bhool gaye tum, islaaf se kia meeras payi thi
ikhlaq k wo kirdaar, jab yaad aty hyn

her muslim doosrey ko kehta dikhai deta hy kafir
yazeedi fouj k "musalman", jab yaad tay hyn

abbas ki shuja'at, sakina ki pyaas or hussain ka azm
sabar o istaqamat k lafz, jab yaad aty hyn

bus dua ye hy k ek hon sab musalman
firqon mein batay dil, jab yaad aty hyn

STOP, CONDEMN- DPs on FB

We proudly set our DPs on facebook. Nowadays a trend is set that DP should be like you want to express your feelings are DP is the most visible thing with your status/profile/id on facebook. I don't know what to say but after setting DP, the only thing you assumes that people can see the love and affection related to the context shared in DP.

Either it would be the blasphemy law OR Ramsha Masih incident, Either it would be the killings of  Muslims in GHAZA or the killings of Muslims in drones attack, Killings in Kashmir or Burma... Sandy or Obama.... Malala or Dr. Afia...we proudly shares a DP condemning the event occurred. After 2 days or 2 weeks a new issue arises and a new DP replaces the old one.

We are the true Hypocrites, who knows to share our fake feelings with the others. So that others can get a positive image about us. Is DP sharing so important ? or setting a DP condemning the videos on youtube decreased your enemies affection ? Can Israel stop killings after watching petitions on social media or India may leave its occupancy in Kashmir? Please Please Muslims think about it... What you are doing may not be wrong but its not right indeed..!

Happy Malala Day

Well if you can say Happy Fathers Day, Mother day, Health day, Children Day blah blah day so I can say Happy Malala Day... O ' Come on ... You people celebrate it whether you agree or not... OK lets talk about Iqbal day, 9th November. Some people say that they don't celebrate birthday but they cannot stop themselves by enjoying gazetted holiday. So if you are annoyed or having bitter taste in mouth so never mind I am telling truth.

Many people will think against this topic but I cannot stop me by writing this as I can see dozens of post regarding MALALA Conspiracy, somebody even made a documentary and wasted his half an hour just proving that it was a planned conspiracy. And finally I came to know today that MALALA was the last trump card for Obama too. We are desperate nation who can just find out a conspiracy in such a few things that seems to useless.

I think people are jealous of Malala that how could she get such a fame and popularity. But dear all for this you have to be shot by gun and if you 'll be alive , perhaps you could have an interview with media or at least your pic in the white dress ( coffin ) may be published by any paper. Think about it, if malala was your sister and the whole world would be praising her, you 'll be happy or indulge in finding conspiracies ? Some people may not be agreed to this and commenting that Why don't I see the drone attacks. O BHAI, how come drones relate to Malala? She belonged to SAWAT, which was never be attacked by the drone. She was fighting against a thought. 

And I forgot to discuss a new fact, that Malala was shot by CIA and Black water ... Ooppssss... They are mad people who cant even shoot Mulla Umer and Fazlullah but they have time to shoot Malala and whole scenario turns in favor of USA. And when Malala's father got job in UK Embassy, people were shocked and claimed him a traitor, but don't see the children of Jihadi Mullas studying in UK, Canada and USA. I heard in my childhood that Qazi Hussain send 5 lakh rupees to Altaf Hussain to come to Pakistan, He returned the amount by excusing and replied that your son may need it for the higher studies in USA ( his son was living in US that time). This might be a joke or a false story but can I ask you that how many of your relatives struggled like Malala in Pakistan or settled abroad just for the sake of themselves.? If you and your family are not satisfied with the country then why do you blame MALALA? Happy Malala Day...!

Sandy

The biggest, greatest and oldest Aashiq e Rasool s.a.w ; I know on this earth is no one else but ALLAH ALMIGHTY. And I believe that He is the only one who cannot leave the enemies of his Holy Prophet s.a.w.
The clear example in the Holy Quran for the Abu Lahab, uncle of Holy Prophet s.a.w, cursed by ALLAH ALMIGHTY Himself. And in Surah e Kausar, whe He tells his Prophet that he won't leave His Prophet's enemies.

Although America faces the storms n yearly basis but this time it is being more horrible than previous ones. specially the monetary loss is exceeding billions of dollar , while considering the fact that American economy is based on trillions of loans and how would their citizens overcome the issue ALLAH knows well... One of the largest business hub of the world New York is 50% shut down.. Offices, Stock Exchange and other assets are experiencing the losses on daily basis,, but still they don't consider this storm as "AZAB E ELAHI" because of their deeds

Definitely they should beg apologies on disrespecting our Holy Prophet s.a.w but they named it as freedom of expression. Now ALLAH Almighty is showing them that the are not free to live in their homes although they have 100% freedom.. May ALLAH bless them with "HIDAYAH".

The Sacrifice and Eid

Allah the Almighty told us of Abraham's affliction with his beloved son:

"And he said after his rescue from the fire:

'Verily! I am going to my Lord. He will guide me! My Lord! Grant me (offspring) from the

righteous." SO We gave him the glad tidings of a forbearing boy. And when he (his son) was old

enough to walk with him, he said: "O my son! I have seen in a dream that I am slaughtering you

(offer you in sacrifice to Allah), so look what do you think!Ý" "O my father! Do that which you

are commanded InshAllah (if Allah wills), you shall find me of the patient."

 Then when they had both submitted themselves to the Will of Allah and he had laid him

prostrate on his forehead (or on the side of his forehead for slaughtering); and We called out to

him: "O Abraham! You have fulfilled the dream (vision!" Verily! Thus do Wereward those who

perform good deeds, totally for Allah's sake only. Verily, that indeed was a manifest trial and We

ransomed him with a great sacrifice (a ram;) and We left for him ( a goodly remembrance)

among generations (to come) in later times. "Salamun (peace) be upon Abraham!" Thus indeed

do We reward the Muhsineen (good doers). Verily, he was one of Our believing slaves. (Ch

37:99-111 Quran)

And muslims are rewarded an EID on which they should sacrifice in the name of ALLAH remembering the sacrifice of Hazrat Ibrahim ( A.S) and Hazrat Ismail (A.S).

Reference: http://www.kalamullah.com/Books/Stories%20Of%20The%20Prophets%20By%20Ibn%20Kathir.pdf

مردہ پرست قوم

We are the scientists, theorist, strategists and we are all that what we are not... Taking Malala's issue aside we can see the photos of CHACHA PAKISTANI of wahga border on social media....

He died in what conditions nobody knows, he got proper food; we are not concerned... He had his own house and earnings... hell with it..... But figers are pointing towards YASH  CHOPRA.... comparison is being made with the person who belongs to an elite class,  who brought out the movies having 1000s of poor CHACHA PAKISTANIS caste in them....

Media , Media, Media..... whatever media do is wrong but everyone has more than 1 TV sets at their home... We used to watch every news just to make another conspiracy theory against media, against Pakistan... Seems like whole world will bows to our thoughts. We don't even bother to ask our legends, our heroes and claim that media is responsible ? Why ?  

Lehri died, who cares,  Sikander Sanam is hospitalized fighting for his life ( our comments:  peeta hoga sala)  but when India rewarded their personalities, their legends we start shouting and start comparing people with even the rubbish things.... Hundreds of CHACHA PAKISTANIS are there but because he died at the day when Yash chopra died we became mad and started comparison... WHY ???  where were we when he was ill, or he had some issues in his life... where were we when he was proving to be a patriotic  PAKISTANI in his  life? after the death he becomes our HERO..... We are nothing but a  مردہ پرست قوم ...!

Malala Yousuf Zai

Some children are extra ordinary and God Gifted by birth. She is one of them.The efforts she made for the peace in different areas of KPK can never be forgotten. Education; her aim, Peace; her vision and struggle; her mission. She was shot in target killing activity. May ALLAH Almighty bless her with good health and life.

Again a cruel deed by Taliban. Unfortunately social media activists are trying to favour them although Talibans have already accepted that this attack was a deliberate effort made by them. Surprisingly she became a victim of Target Killing, not suicide attack. So here comes a fact that there can be Talibans behind target killing activities going on in Karachi, Lahore and different areas of Pakistan.

If such activities continues to proceed then how can we expect our country's economy to be sustained. When the leaders of peace are being targeted then how can a nation produce peaceful leaders? Baluchistan  KPK and Sindh; hundreds of people are being killed on daily basis. And what we usually do, blaming political parties. Why cant our army control such deeds? why cant drones be stopped? Answer is

 only one that we are not one....!

I never saw a social media campaign for Malala before she was shot although she has been doing great activities for more than 3 years. Why we only remembers people when they are gone or going away? Simple ,we need to improve ourselves, we have to become a nation. Please awake before the time we become a HISTORY.

Maslak of Quaid e Azam and Altaf Hussain

I have gone through many posts and comments in which Ahl-e-Tashii are claimed to be MINORITIES… One statement of Altaf Hussain about Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah, was so much publicized and criticized that perhaps he has asked for the property share in Jinnah’s Pakistan. As usual this is the enmity of MQM which is being publicized negatively because Altaf Hussain is one of those politicians who used to condemn such activities openly on media. It is to remind everyone that for no reason this statement is given a negative aspect. Altaf Hussain clearly condemns the murder of Maulana Aslam Shekhu puri, Mufti Sarfaraz Naeemi, Yousuf Ludhianvi Shaeed and many Sunni scholors but his ONE statement in favor of SHIAs is offending people. Please find the links below:

Mufti Shamzai's shadat , mufti-abdus-samad-soomro

It was the incident of Asia Bibi, Mukhtara Mai, Aisha Aalmani or any other lady who suffered due to any reason Or it was the cruelties being faced by Christians, Sikhs, hindus and Even Qadiyanis ( declared as non-muslims in Pakistan's constitution),  MQM always took stand against cruel activities, terrorist attacks, ethnic or religious attacks. As far as Ahl-e-Tashiis are concerned they are not at all MINORITIES in Pakistan as they are Muslims according to the Pakistani law (anybody accepts or not).

There has been a brutal killing of Ahl-e-Tashiis going for many years. Why can’t a Pakistani see the statement in a positive context irrespective of religious views? Even If Quaid e Azam was a converted Muslim but he has been a SHIA for so many years since belonging to a Shia family… I Don’t know why can’t be a Muslim and a PAKISTANI. Every sect claims another sect of Islam KAFIR. Thousands of videos are uploaded on YouTube, so according to them who is the MUSLIM left in Pakistan? 

Why Only Quaid-e-Azam ? whose Maslak is still ambiguous. and many people says that he was the MUSLIM only as there are many different proofs available but we forgets that ahle tashiis are also MUSLIMS. Why do we forgets the efforts of Agha Khan in Pakstan, why do we always forget that when Indian government didnot release a single money it was M. Ali Habib who gave blank check to Quaid e Azam…. Please people come out of the misconceptions, conspiracies .. Just think as a Pakistani... if a single Pakistani is killed then it is the responsibility of the state to take action and responsibility of every politician/leader to give at least a single statement condemning the act.